Top 5 Oracle BRM Alternatives & Competitors in the Market Right Now

Tired of Oracle BRM’s complexity? Here are 5 billing platforms that offer faster setup, stronger features, flexible pricing, and lower costs.

Oracle BRM might be a veteran in billing and revenue management solutions, but let’s be honest—it hasn’t exactly kept up with the times.

With its notoriously complex implementation, rigid pricing models, outdated workflows, and interface that feels straight out of the early 2000s, many organizations are starting to look elsewhere.

The reality is that legacy billing systems like Oracle BRM were built for a simpler time—before subscription models, usage-based pricing, and the need for real-time analytics.

But you don’t have to put up with these limitations anymore. We’ve handpicked the top 5 Oracle BRM alternatives and competitors available right now and analyzed everything from key features to pricing to help you make the right pick.

Why Look for Alternatives to Oracle BRM?

Oracle Communications Billing and Revenue Management (BRM) is an integrated, end-to-end revenue management system that’s built primarily for communications service providers.

It comes with a range of functionalities, including charging, billing, payment processing, and customer management. 

However, for many businesses today, Oracle BRM feels outdated and unnecessarily complicated. It’s powerful, yes—but not always practical. 

Here’s why more companies are exploring other options:

• Hard to set up and use: Oracle BRM is not plug-and-play. Setting it up often requires a full team of developers and months of configuration just to get the basics in place. Even after going live, making simple changes can feel overly complicated due to the system’s rigid structure. [Read Full G2 Review]
• High ongoing costs: It’s not just the licensing fees that are expensive. Custom development, system maintenance, and the need for highly specialized talent drive up the total cost of ownership. For many companies, the return on investment just doesn’t justify the long-term spend.
• Not beginner-friendly: Oracle BRM has a steep learning curve. New users, especially those without a background in telecom billing systems, often struggle to understand its core functions. Without proper training or expert guidance, even basic tasks can become confusing and time-consuming. [Read Full G2 Review]
• Outdated user experience: The interface feels old-school and isn’t designed with the end-user in mind. This can slow down workflows, frustrate internal teams, and create unnecessary training costs, especially when compared to modern, more intuitive platforms.
• Integration challenges: Oracle BRM doesn’t always integrate easily with other platforms, especially modern SaaS tools. Building and maintaining integrations can take a lot of effort and lead to data sync issues if not handled carefully. [Read Full G2 Review]
• Not built for modern billing models: If you’re trying to support dynamic pricing models like usage-based, hybrid subscriptions, or rapid product launches, BRM can hold you back. Adapting the system to handle these use cases usually involves complex custom code and long development cycles.

Oracle BRM Alternatives and Competitors at a Glance

Tridens Monetization

Tridens Monetization is a flexible, cloud-native billing and revenue management platform that can handle complex subscription, usage-based, and hybrid monetization models. 

The platform serves different industries, including telecommunications, utilities, SaaS, IoT, and digital services. The system also provides end-to-end functionality from product catalog management through rating, billing, invoicing, and revenue recognition.

With modern technologies and an API-first approach, Tridens Monetization offers the enterprise-grade capabilities of legacy systems but with greater agility and a lower total cost of ownership.

Key Features

• Automated revenue recognition: Simplifies compliance with accounting standards through customizable revenue recognition rules and automated reporting workflows.
• Real-time charging engine: Tridens offers a high-performance charging system built for speed and scale. It handles usage-based billing in real time while precisely tracking service usage and prepaid balances
• CPQ capabilities: Sales teams can configure complex product bundles and generate accurate quotes without specialized technical knowledge. The CPQ module automatically applies appropriate pricing rules, discounts, and promotions.
• Integrated payment processing: Streamlines cash flow management by automating payment collection across multiple payment methods and gateways.
• API-first design: Seamless integration with external systems through comprehensive REST APIs and pre-built connectors.
• White-label self-service portal: Customers can view usage, manage subscriptions, update payment methods, and access invoices 24/7 without contacting support staff.
• Multi-model billing flexibility: Seamlessly handles diverse revenue models, including one-time purchases, recurring subscriptions, and consumption-based charging within a unified platform.
• Seamless system integration: The platform connects effortlessly to CRM, ERP, taxation, and payment systems, creating a fully automated, end-to-end workflow.
• No-code setup and configuration: Business users can easily set rules, workflows, and pricing logic without any developer support.

Why Do Companies Choose Tridens Monetization Over Oracle BRM?

• It’s faster and easier to launch: Oracle BRM can take months to implement and often needs a team of experts to customize and maintain it. Tridens Monetization keeps things simple. You can configure the platform without coding, make updates without IT help, and launch new services in weeks, not months.
• It’s more affordable and scalable: Oracle BRM often comes with high upfront costs and hidden expenses tied to ongoing maintenance. Tridens offers a more predictable and cost-effective model that fits both midsize businesses and large enterprises. You don’t need a big internal team to run it, and you can scale as you grow (without watching your costs spiral).
• It adapts better to modern business models: Oracle BRM was built with legacy telecom needs in mind. Tridens supports a broader range of industries and pricing models—from subscriptions to pay-per-use to complex hybrid setups. If you want to launch, test, and tweak your offers fast, Tridens gives you that flexibility out of the box.

What Real Users Are Saying About Tridens Monetization

• Incredibly flexible when it comes to product configuration: Users love how easy it is to create and manage a wide range of products, plans, and bundles—no matter how complex. The system adjusts to your business model, not the other way around. [Read Full G2 Review]
• You can easily set up different pricing profiles without developer help: The no-code tools let non-technical teams configure pricing rules, discounts, and usage tiers in minutes. It saves time, reduces errors, and keeps your go-to-market timeline short. [Read Full G2 Review]
• It’s a one-stop solution you can rely on: Tridens covers everything from charging and billing to revenue recognition and customer management. You don’t need multiple tools or clunky integrations since it’s all in one place and built to scale with you. [Read Full G2 Review]

Who Is Tridens Monetization a Good Fit For?

Tridens Monetization is a great fit for companies that need a flexible, scalable billing and revenue management platform—especially those in telecom, utilities, SaaS, and digital services.

It’s also ideal for businesses with complex pricing needs, high transaction volumes, or hybrid billing models like subscriptions and pay-per-use. If you want a single platform to manage charging, billing, payments, and revenue recognition without relying on developers, Tridens delivers.

SAP Billing and Revenue Innovation Management (BRIM)

SAP Billing and Revenue Innovation Management (BRIM) is an end-to-end solution for high-volume billing and revenue management processes.

Companies can use it to manage complex billing scenarios across multiple industries, including telecommunications, utilities, and services. 

Key Features

• Convergent Charging: Processes high volumes of usage data and applies complex pricing rules in real-time. The system can handle millions of transactions per hour while supporting sophisticated rating scenarios like tiered pricing, bundling, and personalized offers.
• Subscription order management: Handles the complete lifecycle of subscription products from the first order through provisioning, billing, and eventual termination. The system automates recurring billing processes while supporting mid-term changes such as upgrades, downgrades, and add-ons.
• Contract accounting (FI-CA): Manages customer accounts, billing schedules, and payment collection in a unified system.
• Revenue recognition: Automatically applies compliance rules to subscription and consumption-based revenue.
• Convergent invoicing: Creates consolidated invoices that combine different product types, services, and billing models on a single statement. The system supports electronic invoice delivery, custom layouts, and multi-language/multi-currency invoicing.

Why Do Users Like SAP BRIM?

• Works well for high-volume usage industries: Users say that SAP BRIM can easily handle massive transaction volumes for telecommunications, utilities, and digital services providers. [Read Full G2 Review]
• Native integration with the SAP ecosystem: Companies already using SAP solutions benefit from seamless data flow between BRIM and other SAP modules like S/4HANA Finance, CRM, and Supply Chain Management.
• Supports complex monetization models: Whether it’s usage-based, tiered, recurring, or hybrid pricing, BRIM supports a wide range of billing structures without heavy customization.

What Are the Limitations of SAP BRIM?

• The underlying tech might be a bit outdated: Despite updates, users mention that parts of SAP BRIM still rely on older technological foundations that can feel clunky compared to modern cloud-native solutions. [Read Full Reddit Review]
• You need professionals who know how to use it: BRIM isn’t beginner-friendly. Users say that it often requires experienced SAP consultants or in-house experts to configure, manage, and maintain, which adds to the total cost of ownership. [Read Full G2 Review]
• Complex to implement and customize: Getting BRIM up and running can take months, especially for businesses that need custom billing logic or integration with non-SAP systems. Even simple updates can turn into complex projects.

Who Is SAP BRIM a Good Fit For?

SAP BRIM is a strong fit for large enterprises with high-volume, complex billing needs—especially in industries like telecom, utilities, media, and transportation.

It’s ideal for companies that need to manage diverse pricing models, handle millions of transactions in real time, and already operate within the SAP ecosystem.

Pricing

Specific costs depend on your company’s size, transaction volume, and the modules you choose. SAP BRIM has custom pricing and you can get exact contract details when you reach out to the company’s sales reps.

Recommended reading: Top 5 SAP IS-U Alternatives & Competitors in 2025 for Smarter Utility Management

Monetizing 5G: Unlocking Its Full Potential

You acknowledge having read our privacy policy by clicking on the button above.

Ericsson Charging and Billing in One (CBiO)

Ericsson Charging and Billing in One (CBiO) is a comprehensive solution that primarily serves telecommunications service providers and helps them manage their charging, billing, and collections processes.

Developed by Ericsson, a global leader in communications technology, CBiO unifies prepaid and postpaid billing operations on a single platform.

Key Features

• Real-time processing: The platform processes usage events instantly, so customers always see accurate, up-to-date account balances.
• Converged Billing: Unifies prepaid and postpaid billing processes within a single platform. This eliminates silos between billing types and operators can offer hybrid plans that combine elements of both payment models.
• Flexible pricing and service setup: CBiO lets you quickly configure new tariffs, discounts, and product bundles without major development work. You can launch new offers faster and adapt to market changes more easily.
• Customer self-service: Provides digital interfaces for customers to view usage, manage accounts, and make payments.
• Built-in customer and partner management: You can manage all customer, account, and partner data in one place. That makes it easier to handle complex relationships and deliver better customer service.

Why Do Users Like Ericsson CBiO?

• Easy to get accurate data on customer service usage: Users say that Ericsson CBiO provides clear, detailed, and timely insights into exactly what services customers use, so it’s easier to manage billing accuracy and customer interactions. [Read Full G2 Review]
• Both postpaid and prepaid charging in one system: Reviewers like that CBiO handles all account types within a single platform. It simplifies operations and removes the need to manage separate systems. [Read Full G2 Review]
• Strong support for complex partner relationships: Companies value how easy it is to manage partner settlements, shared revenue models, and multi-party offers. It’s especially helpful for telcos working with multiple service providers.

What Are the Limitations of Ericsson CBiO?

• The system can be quite complicated: Users mention that the interface and backend aren’t intuitive. Without prior experience or proper training, even basic tasks can feel overwhelming. [Read Full G2 Review]
• Long change request process for even the slightest customizations: Reviewers say that making even slight updates—like adjusting a tariff or optimizing a workflow—has a lengthy approval and development cycle. [Read Full G2 Review]
• Challenging integrations with non-Ericsson systems: While CBiO works well within the Ericsson ecosystem, it can be difficult to connect with third-party platforms.

Who Is Ericsson CBiO a Good Fit For?

Ericsson CBiO is best suited for mid to large telecommunications service providers who need to unify their prepaid and postpaid billing operations. 

It’s particularly valuable for mobile network operators, MVNOs, and communications service providers that want to expand into digital services and need industrial-strength transaction processing.

Pricing

Ericsson does not publicly disclose standard pricing information for CBiO. For detailed and current pricing, you should contact Ericsson directly or consult with an authorized Ericsson partner.

SurePay (by Nokia)

Nokia’s SurePay is a real-time charging platform that helps telecom operators manage both prepaid and postpaid services on one system. The solution supports convergent billing across prepaid and postpaid customers, handling various service types like voice, data, content, and IoT offerings.

Key Features

• Convergent charging: Processes all service types (voice, data, content, IoT) through a unified charging engine. The platform also supports both online and offline charging models.
• Multi-service support: Handles diverse revenue models, including traditional telecoms, digital content, and IoT connectivity in a single platform. The system applies appropriate charging mechanisms for one-time purchases, subscriptions, usage-based services, and complex bundled offerings.
• Real-time rating and charging: SurePay processes voice, data, and messaging usage instantly, so customers always have up-to-date account balances and receive timely notifications.
• Partner settlement: Manages revenue sharing with content providers, service partners, and third-party merchants.

Why Do Users Like SurePay?

• Easier to prevent mistakes: Users say SurePay’s real-time processing helps catch errors before they reach the customer. [Read Full G2 Review]
• Brings robust features at a reasonable price: Reviewers appreciate that SurePay delivers advanced charging and billing features without the massive cost often tied to legacy platforms. [Read Full G2 Review]
• Supports online and real-time payments: Users like that SurePay handles top-ups, balance updates, and service access instantly. This brings a smoother experience for both customers and operators. [Read Full G2 Review]

What Are the Limitations of SurePay?

• Takes more time to load occasionally: Some users report that the system can lag during peak times or when handling large datasets. This may slow down operations. [Read Full G2 Review]
• Reporting functionalities are weaker compared to competitors: SurePay’s built-in analytics and reporting tools aren’t as advanced or customizable as those offered by newer platforms. [Read Full G2 Review]
• Real-time payments could take time to be reflected on the platform: While the system supports real-time charging, users mention occasional delays in reflecting payments or balance updates. [Read Full G2 Review]

Who Is SurePay a Good Fit For?

Nokia SurePay is a good fit for telecom operators that need a reliable, real-time charging system for both prepaid and postpaid services. 

It works especially well for mid-sized providers looking for a cost-effective alternative to heavier platforms like Oracle BRM, without sacrificing core functionality.

Pricing

​Nokia does not publicly disclose specific pricing information for its SurePay solution. The costs can vary based on deployment size, customization needs, and individual business requirements.

Zuora

Zuora is one of the leading cloud-based subscription management platforms in the market, and it helps businesses manage recurring revenue models with a suite of apps for the entire subscription lifecycle.

The platform handles subscription creation, pricing, billing, collections, revenue recognition, and analytics through its flagship products – Zuora Billing, Zuora Revenue, and Zuora Collect.

Key Features

• Subscription order management: Automates the creation, modification, and cancellation of subscription orders with flexible start dates and proration rules. The system also handles complex scenarios like upgrades, downgrades, add-ons, and renewals.
• Dynamic pricing and packaging: Companies can create and modify sophisticated pricing models, including tiered, volume, usage-based, and hybrid structures.
• Revenue recognition automation: Complies with accounting standards like ASC 606 and IFRS 15 through automated revenue recognition rules. The system separates billing events from revenue recognition timing and manages complex scenarios like multi-element arrangements and contract modifications.
• Global payment processing: Supports multiple payment methods, currencies, and tax regulations across different countries.
• Quote-to-cash automation: Streamlines the entire process from initial customer quote through billing, payment collection, and revenue recognition.

Why Do Users Like Zuora?

• Friendly interface and easy to use: Users often mention Zuora’s clean, intuitive interface that makes navigating and managing billing tasks straightforward—even for non-technical team members. [Read Full G2 Review]
• Fits both corporate-level accounting and consumer-level billing: Many appreciate that Zuora handles complex enterprise finance requirements while still supporting flexible, customer-friendly subscription billing. [Read Full G2 Review]
• Quick and responsive customer support: Users report positive experiences with Zuora’s support team, noting fast response times and knowledgeable reps who help resolve issues efficiently. [Read Full G2 Review]

What Are the Limitations of Zuora?

• The documentation isn’t very comprehensive: Users mention that the official help docs often lack depth or clear examples, making it harder to troubleshoot issues or learn advanced features independently. [Read Full G2 Review]
• Customizations sometimes require a lot of manual work: While Zuora is powerful, it does sometimes involve time-consuming setup and manual configuration, especially without developer support. [Read Full G2 Review]
• No flexibility for custom schedules: Users note that Zuora doesn’t provide full control over billing or revenue recognition schedules. [Read Full G2 Review]

Who Is Zuora a Good Fit For?

​Zuora is well-suited for mid-market and enterprise companies that operate on subscription-based models and need a platform to manage recurring billing, revenue recognition, and subscriber data. It accommodates a range of industries, including SaaS, media, and telecommunications.

Pricing

Zuora does not publicly share specific pricing information on its official website. You’ll have to contact sales for a custom quote.

However, data from Vendr says that annual pricing for Zuora typically ranges between $17,943 and $361,620, with a median annual cost of approximately $114,650.

Recommended reading: 7 Best Zuora Alternatives for Subscription & Revenue Management

Amdocs RevenueONE

Amdocs RevenueONE is a monetization suite designed for communications service providers and digital service companies. The platform combines charging, billing, settlement, and financial management capabilities in a single solution.

Key Features

• Catalog-driven architecture: Centers all products, pricing, and offer management in a unified catalog that serves as a single source of truth.
• AI-driven revenue optimization: Uses machine learning algorithms to spot revenue leakage, optimize pricing, and predict customer payment behavior.
• Omnichannel customer experience: Delivers consistent billing information across all customer touchpoints, including self-service portals, mobile apps, and customer service systems.
• Cloud-native architecture: Built on containerized microservices that can be deployed in any cloud environment or on-premises.
• 5G monetization: Supports advanced 5G charging scenarios, including network slicing, edge computing, and quality of service-based pricing.

Why Do Users Like Amdocs RevenueONE?

• Designed for the 5G economy: RevenueONE is built with 5G use cases in mind, so it’s easier to launch and monetize services like IoT, network slicing, and digital content.
• Strong partner management tools: It’s easy to onboard and manage third-party partners, especially in ecosystems that rely on revenue sharing or service bundling.
• Handles complex business models with ease: RevenueONE smoothly manages sophisticated pricing scenarios, including multi-party arrangements and hybrid service bundles.

What Are the Limitations of Amdocs RevenueONE?

• High total cost of ownership: RevenueONE comes with higher costs, including licensing, implementation, and ongoing maintenance expenses. This can be a concern for smaller service providers with limited budgets.
• Resource-intensive maintenance: Maintaining and updating the platform may demand dedicated personnel with specialized skills.
• Integration challenges with legacy systems: While RevenueONE offers extensive APIs, users sometimes struggle when connecting the platform to older operational and business support systems.

Who Is Amdocs RevenueONE a Good Fit For?

Amdocs RevenueONE is a great fit for large telecom operators and digital service providers operating in high-growth markets like 5G, IoT, and digital media.

Pricing

Amdocs doesn’t publish standard pricing for RevenueONE since the cost depends heavily on your organization’s scale, technical setup, and customization needs. Pricing can vary between small deployments and full-scale enterprise rollouts.

Salesforce Revenue Cloud

Salesforce Revenue Cloud is a suite of tools that helps companies manage the entire revenue lifecycle—from quote to cash—on a single platform.

It combines Salesforce CPQ (Configure, Price, Quote), billing, partner relationship management, and B2B commerce into one integrated solution.

Key Features

• Subscription management: Handles the entire lifecycle of subscription products, including initial sales, renewals, amendments, and cancellations.
• CPQ (Configure, Price, Quote): Automates the creation of accurate sales quotes for complex products and services with guided selling processes.
• Multi-channel revenue management: Consolidates revenue streams from various channels, including direct sales, partner sales, and ecommerce. 
• Automated billing and invoicing: Generates accurate invoices based on orders, contracts, and usage data with support for multiple billing frequencies and payment terms.
• Intelligent approvals and workflows: Routes quotes, orders, and billing exceptions through customizable approval processes based on business rules.

Why Do Users Like Salesforce Revenue Cloud?

• It can easily handle complex pricing models: Users appreciate how Revenue Cloud supports tiered, volume-based, bundled, and usage-based pricing without needing complex workarounds. [Read Full G2 Review]
• You can manage the entire revenue lifecycle: From quoting to invoicing and revenue recognition, everything happens in one platform. Users say this reduces handoffs between teams and speeds up cash flow. [Read Full G2 Review]
• Tools to create custom pricing models: The platform lets you build and deploy flexible pricing strategies tailored to specific customer segments or deals. [Read Full G2 Review]

What Are the Limitations of Salesforce Revenue Cloud?

• Can be complex to set up and learn the ropes: Users say the platform comes with a steep learning curve, especially for teams unfamiliar with Salesforce’s ecosystem. It takes time and training to fully understand how everything works together. [Read Full G2 Review]
• Implementation can be long and costly: Many report that rolling out Revenue Cloud requires a major investment in both time and consulting resources. It’s not uncommon for full deployments to stretch over several months. [Read Full G2 Review]
• Calculations can be slow and are often not automatic: Some users note that pricing and tax calculations aren’t always instant and sometimes need to be triggered manually. [Read Full G2 Review]

Who Is Salesforce Revenue Cloud a Good Fit For?

Salesforce Revenue Cloud works best for mid-market to enterprise organizations already invested in the Salesforce ecosystem who want to unify their sales and revenue operations on a single platform.

It’s also particularly valuable for companies with complex quoting needs, subscription-based models, or those that manage revenue across multiple channels and product lines.

Pricing

​Salesforce Revenue Cloud offers various pricing options:

• Revenue Cloud Advanced: Priced at $200 per user per month (billed annually), this edition includes features such as product catalog and pricing, transaction management and CPQ, and contract lifecycle management.
• CPQ (Configure, Price, Quote): At $75 per user per month (billed annually), this edition provides basic CPQ functionalities, including configuration, pricing, and quoting, along with a product catalog and out-of-the-box pricing methods. ​
• CPQ+: Available for $150 per user per month (billed annually), CPQ+ offers advanced features such as document generation, advanced approvals, contract lifecycle management, and advanced order management.

Tridens Monetization – The #1 Oracle BRM Alternative

Tridens Monetization is a modern, cloud-native platform that companies can use to simplify and optimize every part of the revenue lifecycle—from real-time charging and billing to payment collection and revenue recognition.

It’s purposely built for high-growth companies across telecom, SaaS, utilities, and digital services and offers the flexibility, scalability, and speed that legacy systems like Oracle BRM often lack.

Here’s what the platform brings to the table:

• Automates revenue recognition with configurable rules and reporting workflows to stay compliant with changing accounting standards.
• Processes high-volume, usage-based transactions instantly while keeping balances and service data accurate in real time.
• Sales teams can generate complex quotes quickly with automatic pricing logic, discounts, and product bundling.
• Supports automated payment collection across global methods and gateways to improve cash flow and reduce manual work.
• Integrates with external systems through robust APIs and pre-built connectors to streamline data sharing and workflows.
• Offers a branded customer portal for users to view usage, manage subscriptions, and access invoices without contacting support.
• Handles one-time, recurring, and usage-based billing models on a single platform to match any business strategy.
• Companies can easily update pricing, workflows, and rules without developer involvement or coding delays.

If you’re considering an alternative to Oracle BRM that can reduce your total cost of ownership while accelerating your time-to-market for new offerings, Tridens Monetization deserves a closer look.

Book a demo today and discover how you can modernize your billing operations in weeks, not years (without the headaches, complexity, or shocking price tag).

Ready to get started?

Learn how your business can thrive with Tridens Monetization for Communications.

Schedule a Demo